How many times have you wished that somehow, some part of
you were eradicated/different? Many people tend to dislike some part of
themselves, which is why 'Designer Babies' could be introduced. For those who
don't know, a designer baby has genetic make-up selected in ordered
to abolish a particular defect, or to insure that a particular gene
is present. As great as it may seem initially, there are a series of
ethical/moral issues that lie behind the prospect. The fact of the matter
is – the procedure is not even 100% safe yet, so the procedure is rather risky at
this point in time. However, the controversial topic has to be discussed for
the future of medical ethics.
One of the most common opposing arguments include the fact
that the procedure is not cheap and not everyone can afford it. It costs around $50,000 in the US alone,
therefore only the well-off families could afford such an amount. Not only
could this create a prominent line between ‘Designer’ and ‘Non-designer’
children, but the ‘non designer’ children could miss out on life-changing opportunities.
For example, jobs among other things are more likely to take the optimum
candidate (i.e the designer baby, who might have an intelligence-boosting gene
etc..). This will immediately create a gap in society, between the ‘designer’
babies who are better looking, more smarter etc and the ‘non-designer’ who will
feel inadequate and inferior. Induviduality will be barely present, because lots
of people would be relatively similar. If the process is not done carefully,
the embryo could be accidentally terminated – which is why there is a huge risk
factor involved. Another prominent argument is that parents may use the
technology for superficial purposes. These superficial purposes include seeking
out a blonde haired, blue eyed baby for appearance concerns only – which is
morally wrong for the sake of individuality. In addition, you could end up with
a genius, but a very angry child. This is because a gene that controls
intelligence could also control anger management. Therefore, what you desire in
a child could actually create unwanted problems in the long term.
Although all these problems could arise, there are also a
range of benefits that highlight the topic around designer babies. For example,
parents can give their children a healthy life by eliminating any re-occuring illnesses
that run in the family. This aspect would increase children’s life span up to
30 years! Likewise, Parents can also request to abolish any defects they may
have so their children don’t have to live with it too. This would most likely
make the child happier as well as reduce their chances of developing autism,
Alzheimers, Huntington’s disease, and many more. Additionally, inherited
conditions such as obesity, anemia, diabetes and cancer could all be prevented
too. Notably, if designer babies were reinforced, genealogists and biologists
would have a better understanding of genetics. Overall, designer babies would
keep up with modern technologies and enhance children’s lives for the better.
My impression on this topic so far, is that designer babies
should only be required for preventing illnesses or medical defects that might
run in the family. I believe the line should be drawn when parents ask for
their child to have an altered appearance to fit their ideal. The child won’t
nessasarily want to look the way their parents wanted either – which is not
fair on them. Why should we ask for them to look a certain way? After all, Induviduality
is vital and we need it more and more everyday. It’s what makes us special. It’s
what makes humans people. It’s what creates culture.